1. Inicio
  2. Compañías
  3. GDAX
  4. Map de fallos
GDAX

Mapa de Fallos de GDAX

El siguiente mapa de fallos muestra las ubicaciones más recientes en todo el mundo donde los usuarios de GDAX informaron sus problemas e interrupciones. Si tiene un problema con GDAX y su área no aparece en la lista, asegúrese de enviar un reporte a continuación.

Cargando mapa, por favor espere...

El mapa de calor anterior muestra dónde se agrupan geográficamente los reportes más recientes enviados por usuarios y de redes sociales. La densidad de estos informes se representa mediante la escala de colores, como se muestra a continuación.

Usuarios de GDAX users afectados:

Menos
Más'
Revisar Estado Actual

GDAX es una casa de cambio de criptomonedas que ofrece a las instituciones y profesionales la capacidad de comerciar con una variedad de monedas digitales como Bitcoin, Ethereum y más en un intercambio regulado basado en los EE. UU. GDAX es propiedad y está operado por Coinbase.

Lugares Más Afectados

Reportes de fallos e interrupciones de los últimos 15 días se originaron desde:

Lugar Reportes
Revisar Estado Actual

Discusión comunitaria

¿Consejos? ¿Frustraciones? Compártelos aquí. Los comentarios útiles incluyen una descripción del problema, la ciudad y el código postal.

Tenga cuidado con los "números de soporte" o las cuentas de "recuperación" que se pueden publicar a continuación. Asegúrate de informar y votar negativamente esos comentarios. Evite publicar su información personal.

Reportes de Fallos de GDAX

Los últimos problemas e interrupciones reportados en social media:

  • JesziieRaawwrr
    JesziieRaawwrr' (@JesziieRaawwrr) reportó

    @Bayou659 @RobertOstler Hmmmm, I just sent him a message, I am so tired of the slow profits i make from Binance and Gdax.

  • Pledditor
    Pledditor (@Pledditor) reportó

    @scottshapiro @coinbase GDAX had a great UI. Your "updates" only degraded the product. And listing millions of shitcoins was a terrible idea. All you did was trade in short term revenue spike for a generation of broke and disaffected customers who probably won't ever turn again.

  • Mattia30615813
    ilchen (@Mattia30615813) reportó

    @AngeloniFilippo Notate anche voi problemi di liquidata' su conibase pro (ex GDAX) quando si scambia in Euro? Sembra che il prezzo di btc in Euri sia andato molto piu basso del corrispettivo in USD

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reportó

    @nexpotus @FitLikeMummy @BTC_Archive Bitcoin did briefly flash crash to $0.06 on GDAX (Coinbase) in April 2017 due to a system issue, but it was from ~$1,200, not $10k. The 2011 Mt. Gox hack saw it drop to $0.01 from $32. Stink bids are smart—always good to have them ready!

  • AQPulse
    AQPulse (@AQPulse) reportó

    This is not “cheap.” This is failed structure. $AMZN broke out, failed the reclaim, and is now back inside the long-term weekly channel with the GDAX cross rolling bearish. When price re-enters a broken channel instead of escaping it, downside extension toward the lower boundary becomes the more credible path.

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reportó

    @nexpotus @FitLikeMummy @BTC_Archive Bitcoin did briefly flash crash to $0.06 on GDAX (Coinbase) in April 2017 due to a system issue, but it was from ~$1,200, not $10k. The 2011 Mt. Gox hack saw it drop to $0.01 from $32. Stink bids are smart—always good to have them ready!

  • AQPulse
    AQPulse (@AQPulse) reportó

    Long-term $1,000 can stay in the conversation. This weekly chart says the real battle is happening much earlier. $TSLA is sitting right on a major decision layer where channel support, trend support, and price memory are all meeting near 360. At the same time, the weekly GDAX EMA stack has rolled lower and price is still trapped below the 391 to 405 reclaim zone. That matters. Because this is usually where strong narratives either regain structure or start slipping into trend transition. My read here: Hold 360 and reclaim 391 to 405, and TSLA can start rebuilding toward the 480 area and keep the larger channel intact. Lose 360 cleanly, and the chart starts opening toward a much deeper reset, with 247 standing out as the bigger structural support. The upside story gets attention. The decision layer is where money gets made or trapped. AQPulse tracks that layer first.

  • SaaSCapo
    SaaS Capo (@SaaSCapo) reportó

    @DeFifrog1 GDAX basically went down every time there was an opportunity for retail to make easy money lol

  • dan_coff
    Đan Coffman 🏴🛡 (@dan_coff) reportó

    @JasonYanowitz CB Pro predated the Paradex acc by at least 2 years -- it was just called GDAX. Paradex was shut down shortly after acquisition. It isn't accurate to say it became Pro. CB picked up at least one great and really funny engineer tho.

  • bagogel12
    bagogel 🦇🔊 🛸🚀 (@bagogel12) reportó

    @NorthRockLP Coinbase UX is one of the worst in the whole industry. Was looking for the same process, but when you don't have funds on CB it's absolutely not clear. Can't understand how far this has come down ... they should look at kraken pro or go back to gdax, asap.

  • makiabelico_and
    adonis comulay (@makiabelico_and) reportó

    @robertakanda @WhaleInsider Hmmmm, I just sent him a message, I am so tired of the slow profits i make from Binance and Gdax.

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reportó

    @nexpotus @FitLikeMummy @BTC_Archive Bitcoin did briefly flash crash to $0.06 on GDAX (Coinbase) in April 2017 due to a system issue, but it was from ~$1,200, not $10k. The 2011 Mt. Gox hack saw it drop to $0.01 from $32. Stink bids are smart—always good to have them ready!

  • scochat
    Sérgio Coch♻️t (@scochat) reportó

    @Bitcoinity seems the site lost connection with Coinbase (GDAX) API on the last days.

  • MillyBaldwin
    Amelia Baldwin (@MillyBaldwin) reportó

    @robertakanda @RobertOstler Hmmmm, I just sent him a message, I am so tired of the slow profits i make from Binance and Gdax.

  • grok
    Grok (@grok) reportó

    @stansilver2024 @saylordocs Researched claims: No evidence of personal "inside wash trading" or criminal acts by Brian Armstrong. Coinbase (as company) settled 2021 CFTC case for $6.5M over 2015-2018 bot/employee self-trades inflating volumes on GDAX (e.g., one ex-staffer did ~99% fake LTC trades). Called reckless, not intentional; no customer harm, no guilt admitted. Ongoing civil shareholder suits target exec disclosures on custody/AML/listings and 2021 stock sales (internal probe cleared them; no wash trading alleged). Standard fintech scrutiny, no convictions.

Revisar Estado Actual