Mapa de Fallos de CMC Markets

Discusión comunitaria

¿Consejos? ¿Frustraciones? Compártelos aquí. Los comentarios útiles incluyen una descripción del problema, la ciudad y el código postal.

Tenga cuidado con los "números de soporte" o las cuentas de "recuperación" que se pueden publicar a continuación. Asegúrate de informar y votar negativamente esos comentarios. Evite publicar su información personal.

Reportes de Fallos de CMC Markets

Los últimos problemas e interrupciones reportados en social media:

• 
  Bombaytonic (@bombaytonic717) reportó hace 1 minuto

  Many, have wondered why we are not seeing more token speculation from @CMCMarkets insiders especially at recent lows. Quite honestly, maybe it’s already happened, but the below gives an argument why these folks can’t be buying right now or at least difficult for them to do so. CMC has already executed tokenised equity issuance inside regulated custody frameworks (via CMC CapX) with StrikeX minting the mirror token on Arbitrum That is post-legal review activity — meaning: 👉 Compliance 👉 Market abuse teams 👉 Personal account dealing (PAD) surveillance 👉 Regulatory reporting …are already live on anything touching this stack. When a regulated broker-dealer is: •Acting as placement agent •Tokenising securities •And now controls the tokenisation engine …they cross from “crypto partner” into: Dealer-restricted person Under market integrity rules (UK MAR / CIRO equivalents), dealer-restricted persons: “Generally [are] prohibited [from] purchases… of restricted securities where there is undisclosed material information regarding the issuer.” Now here’s the translation into plain English: If CMC Markets has: •Non-public knowledge of •A commercial rollout •Of infrastructure •That they control •Built by StrikeX Then ANY employee trading STRX ahead of launch becomes: ✔ Market abuse risk ✔ Insider dealing exposure ✔ Front-running optics ✔ FCA enforcement risk ✔ Listing rule breach risk ⸻ 🧠 Which Means In Practice: Even if you cannot find STRX on a public restricted list (you never will): Internally, CMC almost certainly has: •PAD pre-clearance requirements •Blackout periods •MNPI attestations •Related-party trading bans •Watch lists (soft) •Restricted lists (hard) …and STRX would be a textbook inclusion candidate because: 📌 They now control product direction 📌 They are commercialising tokenised securities 📌 They are listed on the LSE 📌 They are operating under MAR That is literally the regulatory environment where firms freeze employee trading in partner securities pre-commercial release. In TradFi-native crypto integrations: Retail hype normally comes from: •VC funds •Employees •Devs •Service providers •Advisory firms But here: Anyone inside: •CMC CapX •Corporate broking •Capital markets •Compliance •Engineering •Legal •Product •StrikeX integration layer …is almost certainly PAD-monitored. Meaning: The normal speculative frontrunning mechanism may literally not exist in this case. We’re doing this slowly under regulatory supervision.” They are NOT marketing a crypto app. They are integrating settlement-layer infra into a regulated brokerage. So, that leads me to the reg side of the equation and why that may be part of the wait we are seeing. I’ll touch on that next later on… #StrikeX $STRX

• 
  Motorbike Mike (@postmansam3) reportó hace 3 minutos

  @AdamMancini4 now that my charts are working and the platform filled in the gaps .... my broker, cmcmarkets shows es_f went from about 750 to about 840 in .... 1 second! the problem trading that is, if it went the other way, unless its gslo - its really just a gamble

• 
  Bombaytonic (@bombaytonic717) reportó hace 4 minutos

  Many, have wondered why we are not seeing more $STRX #StrikeX token speculation from @CMCMarkets insiders especially at recent lows. Quite honestly, maybe it’s already happened, but the below gives an argument why these folks can’t be buying right now or at least difficult for them to do so. CMC has already executed tokenised equity issuance inside regulated custody frameworks (via CMC CapX) with StrikeX minting the mirror token on Arbitrum That is post-legal review activity — meaning: 👉 Compliance 👉 Market abuse teams 👉 Personal account dealing (PAD) surveillance 👉 Regulatory reporting …are already live on anything touching this stack. When a regulated broker-dealer is: •Acting as placement agent •Tokenising securities •And now controls the tokenisation engine …they cross from “crypto partner” into: Dealer-restricted person Under market integrity rules (UK MAR / CIRO equivalents), dealer-restricted persons: “Generally [are] prohibited [from] purchases… of restricted securities where there is undisclosed material information regarding the issuer.” Now here’s the translation into plain English: If CMC Markets has: •Non-public knowledge of •A commercial rollout •Of infrastructure •That they control •Built by StrikeX Then ANY employee trading STRX ahead of launch becomes: ✔ Market abuse risk ✔ Insider dealing exposure ✔ Front-running optics ✔ FCA enforcement risk ✔ Listing rule breach risk ⸻ 🧠 Which Means In Practice: Even if you cannot find STRX on a public restricted list (you never will): Internally, CMC almost certainly has: •PAD pre-clearance requirements •Blackout periods •MNPI attestations •Related-party trading bans •Watch lists (soft) •Restricted lists (hard) …and STRX would be a textbook inclusion candidate because: 📌 They now control product direction 📌 They are commercialising tokenised securities 📌 They are listed on the LSE 📌 They are operating under MAR That is literally the regulatory environment where firms freeze employee trading in partner securities pre-commercial release. In TradFi-native crypto integrations: Retail hype normally comes from: •VC funds •Employees •Devs •Service providers •Advisory firms But here: Anyone inside: •CMC CapX •Corporate broking •Capital markets •Compliance •Engineering •Legal •Product •StrikeX integration layer …is almost certainly PAD-monitored. Meaning: The normal speculative frontrunning mechanism may literally not exist in this case. We’re doing this slowly under regulatory supervision.” They are NOT marketing a crypto app. They are integrating settlement-layer infra into a regulated brokerage. So, that leads me to the reg side of the equation and why that may be part of the wait we are seeing. I’ll touch on that next later on…

• 
  One Trade From Zero (@DeanThompson777) reportó hace 4 minutos

  @CMCMarkets All my saved layouts have gone when using web app. A collection of random chart windows are shown in various time frames? On phone app earlier my saved preset time frames had disappeared. I didn't see any notifications that there were problems?

• 
  daniel walter (@dinotruc) reportó hace 4 minutos

  @CMCMarkets Any luck!! Not only are you super slow to report issue but 90 Mons after issue happened the is no update and no communication. Patheticly baf

• 
  Neville Dastur (@nevilledastur) reportó hace 6 minutos

  @CMCMarkets this is not the time to have login problems!! Very bad form

• 
  cathy (@cathy17735402) reportó hace 13 minutos

  @CMCMarkets @I need to adjust my position, your system is down, can you please fix the problem soon

• 
  Mariano (@OCEO_MG) reportó hace 15 minutos

  @CMCMarkets Service down? Whats going on?

• 
  Mehak Khanna (@Mehak__INDIA) reportó hace 19 minutos

  @CMCMarkets @MichaelMOTTCM This is the secind time this week the platform is having issues. If the account is closed due to the CPI data will you be responsible for it now?

• 
  Shazaa (@noc606) reportó hace 21 minutos

  @MonVCamacho @CMCMarkets I’m having the same issue, login details can’t be recognised. Are you based in the UK?

• 
  Mat (@MTradingX) reportó hace 22 minutos

  @tacticalgibbon Anything NET negative to the customer, and that customer bounces. Hence why when CMCMarkets was the king in the 00s era (looks like you probably know the days) it got cannibilised by smarter players who offered A)better product and B) genuine incentives.

• 
  David Eppel (@DavidEppel1) reportó hace 23 minutos

  @CMCMarkets should be down 10% it's a big Ponzi scheme where the poor kids of today will pay for the excesses of the rich

• 
  Kruz (@PKruzcontrol) reportó hace 26 minutos

  @mhewson_CMC @CMCMarkets They have so much **** on their balance sheet, they couldn't raise rates even if they wanted to. Either it will end in hyperinflation and a following revolution. Or they will crash the system and issue cdbc to everyone so you can't escape. Probably the second.

• 
  Letsgooooo (@TradeStrikeX) reportó hace 29 minutos

  Great advice, I wish I knew this in my 20’s!! 🧠 Have you any $STRX in your portfolio? 👀 Would be smart to hold some to help you reach your next target 🎯 2 mins of DYOR will confirm the institutional investment by @CMCMarkets who are FTSE250 listed into @TradeStrikeBVI - the makers of #StrikeX 🚀💹🦾🚀💹🦾

• 
  rezgar (@Rjavidfar) reportó hace 29 minutos

  @CMCMarkets **** right at the day that market bounced ???